Wednesday, June 1, 2011

No Need For a God

Evolution is a fact. Period. Which means that the Bible is wrong. And if the Bible is wrong then it has no foundation in reality and no basis for its moral code. Does this mean that God doesn't exist? No. But it shows that the God of the Bible and his moral law are not compatible with the evidence. I know that I repeat this again and again in most of my posts, but I can't stress the importance of this. Do not let yourself be guilted and manipulated by religions that have no basis in reality and which are contradicted by all available evidence. Sure, a God may exist, but it's highly unlikely. The actions of every God so far constructed by the human mind have been explained by science and attributed to natural phenomena which we can observe and test. What about a Deistic God? It's a nice idea to have a God that sets up the universe and lets it roll. But what's the point in believing that. Everything that we know about science can be explained naturally, with no supernatural involvement. Why should the origins of the universe be any different? It is special pleading to invoke a God - one might say out of emotional need for there to be purpose and design to the universe - to explain something unexplained, when everything in science that used to be unexplained and attributed to the hand of God has now shown to be completely natural.

No comments:

Post a Comment